Someone correct me if I'm wrong:
JORN has proved that even "stealth" aircraft can be observed by long range RADAR - at least under some circumstances.
The FA-18 in its proposed new form is fairly "stealthy" - at least low observable.
It is faster than earlier models
It is optimised as an attack aircraft
Other packages can be mounted on some specialised versions
It is available almost immediately
It is half the cost of the JSF
It will carry out most if not all of the RNs requirements of the JSF
It is likely to be usable beyond 2025
The new carriers can/will be fitted with electromagnetic catapults
It will fit into their lifts.
It will be available virtually simultaneously with the first of the new carriers.
Both the carrier and the aircraft could go to the USA for training.
While there may be a long-term financial return buying the JSF, our financial problems are immediate and need an immediate remedy.
While it doesn't do all the tricks of the JSF, it is a proven, extendable aircraft.
To my mind there is no argument. We need the FA-18 "stealthy" version and we should buy it now. Why is my logic faulty?