MidgetBoy:
Your argument might have made sense to the legislators 30-some years ago when the proposed human rights law was initially debated, but if you read the beginning pages of this thread, you will see that that argument is totally irrelevant today.
The primary issue here is the legal validity of a collective agreement provision in the context of human rights legislation, not the merits of the agreement itself on any other grounds, including safety. A secondary issue is how to deal with the implications arising from the first issue.
Wrong fight, sir.