How do you quote another post on this forum?
Anyway:
Rod1,
WW says he is actively involved with LAA matters and treads the boards of the LAA offices. That is not going to be "Welshman".
Point of order:
If WW feels he must post anonymously or risk excommunication then that is a serious misunderstanding of the way LAA operates. Even though it is now a limited company the CEO still has limited powers and could not remove anyone's membership. Only the EC (now a board of directors) could do that and there are plenty of checks and balances there to stop such a thing happening without a lot of justification not the least BFJH above. Even if the board did so it would then have to justify it to members at the AGM or EGM. and it could be overturned. So WW I see no reason to be anonymous and saying who you are will add credibility to your position.
As for the issue of paid leave that is between a CEO and the board. If the board approved it I trust them to run the organisation how they see fit. I would prefer he was out flying his proper aircraft however
Steve