Originally Posted by TCF
whilst also 'controlling' the tendancy for thrust induced pitch-up.
- yes - in my opinion I would have preferred the manufacturers to have focussed on 'unusual attitudes'+pitch/power couples rather than fiddling with basic stall recovery techniques. We are seeing many examples of failure to control this, and 'tweaking' the stall recovery will not stop these a/c losing control in a g/a. A few years back Boeing pushed out a series of 'U/Ps' plus notes and videos for a recurrent sim exercise.
Personally if I am stalling near the ground I want and need power.
The procedure (as described by Airbus) is now to SMOOTHLY INCREASE THRUST AS NEEDED but only when out of stall.
- hmm!
As with others here, I am still unclear what this amendment means by the STALL in terms of recovery - stall warning or full stall?