It has been on the government agenda for over 10 years and been resisted by incompetent bureaucrats for far too long.
So has a flat rate of tax ... but I can't see that coming in anytime soon.
All of these incidents and accidents have happened in uncontrolled radar covered airspace that Australia has refused to upgrade to controlled airspace. Astonishing stupidity.
So I assume your position is that, no matter what the cost benefit position is ... if there is radar coverage ... it must be controlled airspace and it must be manned. Is that a reasonable and realistic position to hold?