Originally Posted by
Snas
As a Union rep yourself I’m sure that you wouldn’t consider his actions as being wise or productive to say the least. Indeed I’m surprised that a professional union hadn’t sacked him as a representative themselves long before BA were required to take action.
I agree it was not an action covered in glory, for which he has paid a heavy price. In my opinion too heavy, because I am sure in different circumstances he would still be employed.
However, in the current climate at the world's favourite, I imagine that if any cabin crew employee crosses that imaginary line (that is always moving) and especially a union rep, then the full force of the disciplinary process will be actioned. So why give the employer reason?