mm43
..but time is of the essence and delaying data by a few milliseconds could be critical. Why not use higher sample rates? Well, some noise spikes could appear over a number of cycles, but higher rates do lend themselves to determining a trend quickly.
Is this categorically correct do you think?
What air data value and what use of that data would really be critical or compromised by a throughput a few milliseconds slower.
And if an exampe can be given, then of what value when the data quality is potentially compromised.