I find some of the posts hilarious on this forum.
Shame as there is some good posts where knowledge can be obtained.
As I read through the many posts, I always seem to come across a post which
says "Ba can the strikers legally if they were able to overturn a strike through a court decision".
I think you will find, legally Ba cannot.
If Ba can prove the next strike is illegal, all strikers will still be protected.
Its the Union, who has to pay.
Monetary or through some other means.
Whats interesting is why would Ba, notify cabin crew or the Union, that its possible that there members might not be protected if a possible strike happens in the future.
Apparently Ba are losing millions, recruiting a new fleet.
Why not just allow a possible strike to happen, take them to court , win the case, fire the staff and sue the Union for lost money owed.
Recruit Temps until they are able to grow there new fleet to the amount they need.
Don't forget, according to the Daily Mail, there are 25,000 people waiting to sign up.
So why warn the union and possible strikers?
Anybody know how to play poker?