I'm with P-Dubby, CivilAir put in a highly researched and well articulated submission to CASA about E+ airspace and CivilAirs' concerns are along the lines of what is being said here.
Civilair have also asked ASA for their submission.
As I have stated elsewhere on pprune, if a controller refused to work the airspace, under which Courts jurisdiction would this be heard.
Civilair took the lead in the last NASdebate.
Would any pilots care to refuse to fly in the airspace? It is not up to the individual to martyr themselves, but for CASA and ASA to get it right without the political interference we have seen.
The OAR came about because it was seen that ASA would have a conflict of interest in being the designer and user of airspace. Is this new system any better?