Originally Posted by
Wirbelsturm
Litebulbs,
By your (former Amicus rep) interpretation, if anyone loses a benefit within the company for any reason then it should be removed for all?
Why does the removal of a benefit/perk for those taking part in damaging IA which allows only protection from dismissal mean that said perk should be removed from all or not at all?
Because there has been no process followed. As of yet, or until I or anybody else can find an example of where a benefit has been removed as a punishment for industrial action, then yes, in my opinion, it should be all of a bargaining group, or none. Remember that Unite/BASSA has
collective bargaining rights with BA.