Originally Posted by
Timothy Claypole
Those who've lost staff travel will certainly argue it shouldn't have become involved! Others might say that BASSA have been far to quick to call for strike action in the past and this time they need to understand that actions have consequences. BA have a right to defend themselves against industrial action, why should the BASSAmentalists get away scot free?
Some interesting points and I agree to an extent, with your first point.
Those that went on strike have not got away scot free, as you put it, they have lost money. That is a consequence of IA. As I said in previous posts on the old thread, I have not found any case law that has set a precedent, for a business to remove a benefit from a group of employees who have taken part in IA, but are only part of a bigger group, who did not. I am not saying that it hasn't happened. If it has and you can find it, my argument fails.