Litebulbs,
By your (former Amicus rep) interpretation, if anyone loses a benefit within the company for any reason then it should be removed for all?
Why does the removal of a benefit/perk for those taking part in damaging IA which allows only protection from dismissal mean that said perk should be removed from all or not at all?
You can't cry under discrimination as it is at the wish and will of the management as to whether any member of staff 'deserves' said perk and there are no laid down rules or regulation for removal.
This dispute is NOT about ST, that is just a red herring, it allows Unite to continue to bluster whilst they try and get their incalcitrant child under control.