Who to Give in
Miss M
Haven't really appreciated many of your posts but the fact you have responded to most questions and in particular, questioned why you weren't offered the chance to vote on a BA proposal proves you weigh up the evidence.
PC767
What disappoints me about the email you reproduce is that it shows Walsh has no intention of seeking a solution. No dates for a ballot have been announced, and there is no indication of what the result of a ballot may be. Instead of using the time to find a solution, Walsh rattles his sabre.
W Walsh is doing what he and his board are paid to do - strategic planning. If there is a threat of action, as a feduciary duty of a Director to plan around it. If they left it until a positive vote (if it was) had been taken, then shareholders could sue them personally.
Why is always BA/Walsh that should give in or change. Your suggestion that all dicips should be heard by an independent third party is against the agreement already in place and agreed to by both parties. If BASSA doesn't trust BA or wants these hearings, would BASSA be willing to fund them?
I haven't seen W Walsh requesting a certain "lady" to be dicip'd because she called him a ---- perhaps you find that acceptable?
MF