So then, why not sack ALL cabin crew? There is no way to tell who voted yes; who voted no. There is no way to tell (without speaking to them - besides people lie about it anyway) who went on strike and who didn't. The cabin crew member who voted yes but went to work during every strike is still guilty of financially hurting (as well as our reputation) the company so isn't the only way to rid the cancer that is festering just to sack ALL cabin crew? Obviously, those that don't belong to a union (about 4000?) could be exempt from being sacked and once the 90 day notice is expired enough people could be hired to replace those gone. Certainly enough people who are currently at the job centre would be up for it? Also, BA could bring back those who accepted VR, if they were interested.
If BA decides to bring sacked (not VR crew) people back it would be on a reduced T&C contract and they would all be NF. The cabin crew has hurt BA very badly; why not hurt the cabin crew back? Serious question!