avec Boeing qui enfonce le clou et me donne raison sur toute la ligne : Unlike Airbus, Boeing lets aviator override fly-by-wire technology
Cher Buanana: lis-tu l'anglais?
Je cite ton article:
The Airline Pilots Association, the largest pilot union, recently published a series of technical papers on the issue.
"The pilots had strong opinions -- both ways," said Capt. Paul McCarthy, executive air-safety chairman for the union.
"There are good arguments on both sides," he said. 'Both make legitimate points. And both sides are correct. . . . It's a good, healthy debate that will continue for the next five to 10 years until everyone is confident which way we should go."
Traduction: la loi de programmation de pilotage d'AIRBUS et celle de BOEING sont toutes deux excellentes.
Statistically, the accident rates for Boeing and Airbus planes are about the same.
Comme prouvé par les statistiques.
Vandell said he cannot recall a particular crash of a Boeing or Airbus plane in which a case could be made that, had the plane used the other manufacturer's system on limits, the crash could have been prevented.
Et on ne connait pas de cas ou la philosophie de l'un (AIRBUS ou BOEING) aurait permis d'éviter un accident d'un appareil de l'autre (BOEING ou AIRBUS).
Donc ton article prouve que tu as tort depuis un quart de siècle et que nous autres avions raison.
Cela m'émeut profondément cher Buanana, de constater que tu sais reconnaitre tes errements passées. C'est très bien. Bravo!
