Can anybody explain the reasons for the ongoing discussion about the possibility of an inflight breakup or a partial inflight breakup?
BEA was in most parts of the tragic events very common, in the part of impact with the water and the probable condition of the hull prior impact very specific. The result had its origin in the found pieces of wreckage and most probably some experts looking at those in person and detail (despite us looking only at pictures) came to strong results, leading to the statement of BEA.
So what is the real sense in turning this result over and over? Would it not be better to accept it for the moment until other information tells otherwise and go on from that point?
franzl