PJ2 wrote:
At present, experienced, knowledgable members know that their contributions won't even be read or valued
You read what's been written already now, do you therefore consider your contribution just as
'not experienced and knowledgable', or do you consider yourself above all other contributors?
then you continue:
In the meantime, please don't consider the level of discussion here, especially the usual conspiracy and standard anti-Airbus agendas
Are you asking us to consider
your level of discussion however?
finally you write:
I don't get the feeling that this outcome had anything to do with the airport, the navaids, ATC or the country the accident occurred in
This is legitimate. You contribute your actual oppinion, which with the momentary absence of facts is just that. But please let others contributors state their oppinion just as much without instantly belitteling them.
(By the way, in your last quote, did you deliberately leave out 'aircraft'? That might be considered anti-Airbus as well ....)