You seem unable to understand that you don’t have to be ‘guilty’ of anything in order to fail to comply with or fall below a regulatory standard
Failing to comply with a regulatory standard is completely different to falling out of favour with your FOI/AWI.
Your example is pretty irrelevant, we are not talking about a medical, we are talking about FOIs and AWIs in the workplace:
* Personal opinions becoming enforced as law,
* Ego in the workplace,
* a "Get them" attitude, very personal.
A mean spirited FOI / AWI can do a lot of damage to an operator, they need to be held accountable for their actions, it is a matter of time untill this will be tested in Court, hopefully very soon if Mr Butson does not settle out of court or drop his case ( which I doubt he will ).
If an operator is no longer meeting the published regulatory standards, CASA should take action, clear and concise, understand that the holder is entitled to take it to court/AAT and for the allegations to be tested and evidence to be presented.
Understand in this example, in the time between you starting the process of taking them to court and actually going to court, the operator may make the required changes to meet the regulatory compliance standard, but this is not what we are talking about.
We are talking about misinterpretation of legislation, personal vendettas and individuals pushing their personal agendas/opinions with out, so far, being held accountable.
How do you think life would change is some of these situations found themselves in court and malfeasance was proven, people having their homes and possession taken from them.
If its not in the legislation is does not exist.