Found on the DICK Smith Flyer (in relation to Avalon):
The fourth paragraph of your letter indicates that Mr Smith has obtained advice from ‘experts’ supporting his opinion. Given the circumstances of your correspondence, we are surprised that these experts are not named, that their credentials are not provided and that we have not been provided with a copy of their assessments.
So much for anonymous posters...
oooh and further:
Dick:
4. “Acting inconsistently with the government’s 2007 Policy Statement”
OAR:
The summary points listed here are a mis-representation of the AAPS, namely:
a) the Policy statement directs a risk and cost benefit based approach to regulation: Not simply to copy the US NAS