Originally Posted by rgbrock1
So for the BEA, or whomever was quoted by the above statement, to come up with such a cop-out is disingenuous at best. They have much more data and evidence to work with than anyone here in this thread. Yet they claim that can't construct a scenarios based on this evidence?
Those were merely the words from a journalist
AF 447 : les recherches restent infructueuses
For sure we can not establish with certainty what happened, but we know that unreliable airspeed indication can lead to loss of control. We know also that a vicious unreliable airspeed indication could also
inappropriately trigger some Airbus protections …
Yes, there are definitely some possible scenarios, and they are really not that far fetched.
But since the first of June of last year, I can feel that constant desire from the BEA to minimize the possible role of the Pitot tubes in that tragedy, am I the only one ?