ratherbeflying:
Thanks for the translation. This part, however, is dubious:
"The elements that the researchers have in their possession effectively do not allow construction of any scenario nor defining the share of responsibility among the aircraft, crew and company."
Not any scenario? Bulls**t.
I've been following this thread since day 1 i.e., 1 June 2009. There has been a lot of conjecture on this thread, granted. But I have also read plenty of hypothesis by professionals here which not only seem reasonable but highly accurate and probably very close to the mark. And in all these pages and pages of postings I believe what really happened to AF447 is contained herein.
So for the BEA, or whomever was quoted by the above statement, to come up with such a cop-out is disingenuous at best. They have much more data and evidence to work with than anyone here in this thread. Yet they claim that can't construct a scenarios based on this evidence? Bulls**t.
Is it they can't? Or don't want to?