PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NAS rears its head again
View Single Post
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 00:33
  #494 (permalink)  
peuce
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Nastronaut Inconsistency

It is difficult to warm to your ideas when you publish inconsistencies.
Here is a statement from mjbow2
...The end state design of NAS was to have all radar covered airspace a minimum classification of Class E
Followed by Leadsled's creed:

As I have said, time and again, the separation assurance standard is the same in each classification, and it is so high that adding additional resources does not "increase safety".

On the one hand you appear to be demanding a blanket Class E ... beacause you can. On the other, you say that once safety is assurred ( as in current Class F) it is rediculous to upgrade the classification.

You can't have it both ways ....
peuce is offline