PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NAS rears its head again
View Single Post
Old 19th Apr 2010, 11:44
  #444 (permalink)  
The Chaser
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: hot on the heels of worthy targets
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More misinformation from the NAStronauts

http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/1361820...604222_001.pdf
In response, the pilot of the Baron turned his aircraft to the right and off the published missed approach procedure, reaching 5,200 ft shortly thereafter. The pilot of the Baron indicated that the right turn was as a result of his previous training, including the conduct of a right turn in order to avoid conflicting traffic. That was also consistent with the collision avoidance requirements of Civil Aviation Regulation 162 (2). The pilot in command of the SAAB reported that:

the minimum distance between the two aircraft that was displayed on the TCAS was between 500 and 1,200 ft vertically, and 3 to 4 NM horizontally
neither a TCAS TA nor RA was received on the Baron.

The SAAB continued the runway 29 straight-in RNAV GNSS approach and landed. The pilot of the Baron conducted an NDB approach procedure and landed on runway 29.

The crews of both aircraft reported that neither had considered their self-separation requirements if they or the other aircraft were required to conduct a missed approach.
The airspace in the vicinity of Orange Aerodrome was structured in accordance with the National Airspace System (NAS). In addition, the provision of mutual traffic information by air traffic control to the pilots of both aircraft was in accordance with the requirements of the Manual of Air Traffic Services (MATS).
Contributing safety factors

Neither flight crew considered their self-separation requirements if they or the other aircraft were required to conduct a missed approach.

Other key findings

• The airspace in the vicinity of Orange was structured in accordance with the National Airspace System (NAS).
• The provision of mutual traffic information by air traffic control to the pilots of both aircraft was in accordance with the requirements of the Manual of Air Traffic Services (MATS).
• The flight crews of both aircraft complied with the published common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) communication procedures.
So now you are baggin' the NAS you NAStronauts want?

Make your minds up

And anyway, the relevance to busy airspace above class D would be????????????
The Chaser is offline