Please Note:
And the CASA Director of Aviation Safety Promotion at the time of the
G-spot trial was? Anyone? drumroll.....
For the record Mr Mike Smith, I understand, was appointed to the role, but
did not become incumbent until just after it had started, so he cannot be
held responsible for it's design and implementation and it would not be fair
to do so. Neither is his past employment activity of any interest.
So what, we have all done all manner of jobs on our road to this place.
Me, I think I had more fun driving a D10, nobody argues with somebody
driving a D10.
Given the personalities, politics and heat involved in this issue, I
personally believe he should be applauded for his courage in taking on the
implementation role in that atmosphere and what could undoubtedly be a very
difficult task.
It could be more difficult than it need be if we aim, in time honoured
fashion to shoot the messenger and we risk marginalising the very real and
highly competent input available from these halls.
Or we could make it easier and more effective and satisfying if we stay on
the subject matter and all work together towards a common goal.
It is entirely possible that the other Mr Smith hijacked a process that was
already in train or he just got the timing right for the promotion of 'his'
NAS. We all know that in life "timing" is everything. It might also be the
reason many feel 'his' NAS needs more development or explanation
Either way and I would be surprised if Mr Dick Smith didn't agree with me,
it really doesn't matter, it got the Ministers attention, fully on the
public agenda and however it transpired, Mr Mike Smith is now tasked with
the implementation of
"your" new airspace system not necessarily the
other Mr Smiths.
To some who need it to be so, this would be a significant victory, Mr Dick
Smith does polarise debate, so what, lets look and go past that.
It is not about winning or losing is it, neither is it about who is running
interference for whom.
Perhaps this will allow a
better and more resonsible forum for the
full and proper development of
"A" National Airspace System for which
the industry participants can claim their rightful ownership.
Those involved must know full well that passing down "received wisdom" from
on high may have been the manner of the past but will not now work.
Any new or reformed system must have gained full ownership
by all
participants and
for all participants for it to become fully
embedded.
Whether you like it or not, the mechanism has been set up, I am sure the new
group will welcome all the help it can get.
Use it now or forever lose the chance to "make a difference" and help get
Australian aviation back on track.
Or is it "easier and safer" for everyone at some time in the future to be
able to sit back and blame all our aviation shortcomings on good 'ol Dick.
Now that we have the internet and this forum and direct contact with anybody
we wish there are no longer any barriers to communicating your thoughts and
beliefs or shining lights into dark places.
Dick's might have big shoulders, but on past performances he will be very
quick to remind you that you have a chance now like never before.