mjbow2,
No need to apologise; but I do appreciate the olive branch - I do not like rational debate descending to name calling either.
The fact is, and if you look at my previous posts, my question remains unanswered:
Why should we accept E, when positive, guaranteed, separation can be provided with C? It's just not logical.
As regards my thoughts on G as opposed to E, that is location specific. Under G, and BME CTAF(R) there is a mandatory reporting requirement within 30nm. With E, no such requirement exists. Tell me which is better. An environment where at the minimum, you get a traffic alert, or where you just don't know what's out there under E procedures?
Once again, I do not want to descend to invective. But the question remains - if a higher level of service is achievable, why not provide it?