Chris Scott;
Originally Posted by Chris Scott
But may I suggest it may be advisable to provide an attribution, in case someone assumes it is extracted from an official report?
Quote:"The DFDR traces in the ATSB report include AoA, but the scale chosen to show the ‘spikes’ is too small to read a real AoA value."
I see the problem, but would it still be worth superimposing the official AoA trace on your graph, for comparison purposes: uncorrected – and perhaps also corrected – by the Prandtl-Glauert "rule"?
Thanks for both suggestions. I've added a note to the graph and the post.
Adding the 'official' AoA doesn't seem practical: The AoA trace is on figure B2, which has a different timescale from figure B4 that I used, and 10 degrees AoA is only 3 pixels.
regards,
HN39