Originally Posted by FCOM
Just remember folks the CAA don't just give out Atpl's like cookies,they have to be earned and have to work just as hard as any airline sponsored cadet . The type rating is the same standard and the only difference is they weren't fortuanate enough to get it all handed on a plate. If these Pilot's don't cut the mustard they simply do not pass the course or the line training,simple as that. If your against low time pilots flying large commercial aircraft that's fine, then British Airways should also follow this route as it cuts both ways.On the other hand if it's good for BA the same should follow for self sponsored, the only difference is the BA guys have been through a selection procedure oh and a 2 day RT course so they can all sound the same!
Whilst the basic premise of your argument is true - all pilots must pass the same CAA/JAA regulated course, the conclusion is flawed. The standards for a type are the bare minimum and should never be the goal. An airline investing in training will contribute to raising the standard above the bare minimum as they have the luxury of constantly selecting the best cadets and pushing them to a higher standard. Think of this as similar to the MEL and MMEL. Having a higher company standard is always preferable.
No one is claiming that some guys who do a SSTR aren't as capable as a sponsored cadet - but it would be impossible to guarantee an SSTR guy has reached a higher level than the basic requirements of a type rating primarily as money is a driving force.