PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NAS rears its head again
View Single Post
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 08:55
  #244 (permalink)  
peuce
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,142
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Griffo,

You had me stumped there for a while ... but I finally worked it out

I, for one, would also like to join the "No E Without Surveillance" campaign
I would even go so far as to say that I would probably consider supporting Class E above Broome, IF:
  • There was a surveillance facility in place
  • Every aircraft entering the airspace had a black box that allowed it to be surveilled ... by ATS

How we would deal with aircraft that couldn't carry a black box ... I'm not sure. But I'd support attempts to try and find a way.

So, in summary, I'm not against change. I support careful and appropriate change. I don't even think ICAO had envisaged, nor encouraged, the use of Non-surveillance Class E airspace.
peuce is online now