Simon
You make it appear as if these employers didn't know what's been going on since 2001! These employers shaped JAR/Part 66 locally with money, meetings and that all important can-do approach (Right John?) .. So given what you've said Simon, as a Recruitment Specialist, In other EASA NAAs there now must be a sizeable population of existing EASA Part 66 AML holders trapped by the actions of their NAAs with limited career mobility - does this apply across Europe now?
I'm intrigued because Singapore and Malaysia only have openly been this selective from what I recall. What EASA AMLs are acceptable (or not) and where in Europe today?
BAe