Crew Rest Area
This old chestnut is symptomatic of a wider malaise. Whether or not a payment is justified, whether or not the door is habitually faulty, it appears to me that the company has been in dereliction of its responsibilities for allowing a situation like this to grow to the extent it appears that it has. For this defect to occur as regularly as it seems then there must be a design fault with the mechanism. An engineering solution (child proof) ought to have been found rather than allow this "piece rate award" to gain common currency in the way that it has.
It looks to me as if there has been no joined up thinking between IFCE and Engineering in attempting to address this issue.
OR, perish the thought IFCE were quite happy to "allow" this practice to continue thus rewarding an already well rewarded workforce.
Call me cynical if you like, I've been there.......