So what is all the fuss about.........works here!
1.5 Findings
In general, all airspace users consulted indicated that the airspace design and classification is suitable for its current use. This is also confirmed by the results of the simulation model constructed for Rockhampton.
The study revealed: ASIR and ESIR reports as discussed in chapter 6 indicate that failure to observe ATC instructions and VCAs are the most observed airspace related safety incidents. As summarised in chapter 6.3, these incidents cannot directly be linked with the design and classification of airspace provided at Rockhampton. The results of the fast time simulation of the airspace around Rockhampton lead to the conclusion that the Class D airspace with the relevant procedures applied will provide sufficient defences against the closest potential conflict pairs identified. Details are explained in chapters 7.12.3 and 7.12.4. The dimensions of Class D and Class C airspace around and above Rockhampton are deemed to be adequate by the airspace users and ATC (see chapter 5.5). The results of the fast time simulation did not provide any other evidence to the contrary and no documentation was found during the study indicating otherwise. All airspace users consulted indicated that the airspace classification utilised is suitable for its current use (chapter 5.5). The fast time simulation results did not show any conflict pairs for operations outside the tower hours. This can partially explained by the fact that the only data available for this time period were the Airservices EUROCAT records (see chapters 7.9 and 7.11.1). The airspace classification of Rockhampton can be considered to be appropriate for its use.
It is recommended that: CASA continue monitoring the airspace around Rockhampton with particular focus on changes in IFR and VFR numbers and traffic mix. CASA seek movement data for operations outside tower hours. Class C airspace overhead the Class D airspace at Rockhampton be maintained unless an aeronautical study using an appropriate airspace risk analysis methodology and cost benefit analysis can prove significant benefits for Class E. It is recommended that the OAR maintain a watch of activity at Rockhampton airport during the bi-annual review of movement data, and, if total aircraft movements significantly increase, or after five years, whichever occurs first, further airspace review or an aeronautical study will be conducted to reassess the risk to RPT operations.
I like the bit about unless there is a significant benefot for E ..........about summs it up!
So why are we wasting all this time and money?
