as everyone involved in the campaign undoubtedly realises, it has nothing to do simulations, partiality of those involved and governmental cowardice, yet all play their own part.
simplistically, for my own benefit, it all rests on a point of law; whether the absolutely no doubt whatsoever criterion was satisfied in accordance with established legal precedent. The H of L law lords decided that it was not. and the problem in accepting this is ... ?
question is whether the MoD have the balls to come back and say that the ruling of those of the highest echelons of the judiciary is pants, and that a couple of (albeit high ranking) muppets know best. dont fancy their chances much i must say.
any constitutional experts out there to detail what could happen if the govt refuse to accept their lordships decision?
well done brian, chocks and all those continuously lobbying their MP's. my chap is on the list too.