PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Initial Approach Fixes, FAFs and a rant!
View Single Post
Old 22nd March 2010 | 01:49
  #35 (permalink)  
galaxy flyer
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
aterpster

All too well. I was at an AF Standards Agency conference where we were briefed by none other than Jepp's VP who has a last name remarkably like your handle here. Long briefing on that accident and related discussion, lots of good information that changed AF policy. Much to my relief.

OzExPat

I believe it was a TWA/United mid-air over NYC that brought about three changes:

DME required in the PCA (Class A airspace, now)
Report all navigation malfunctions to ATC
Slow to holding airspeed 3 minutes prior to the fix.

IIRC UAL overran the hold due to DME failed and was cross-tuning, let the speed get away and sped past the fix. EMPIRE, I think.

So, yes, slowing is very desirable and required, as is using the entire procedure to be configured prior to the FAF.

GF

PS Did the ark sail in 1967? Ha Ha
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply