PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why 1.3 Vs for approach?
View Single Post
Old 19th March 2010 | 20:28
  #18 (permalink)  
IGh
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Castlegar
Tail damages -- Low ENERGY attempts at Balked Landing

Mentioned two slots above:
"... aircraft ... can perform a go around at any time on the approach up until touch down, even in the flare ... below the S&L stalling speed ...."
Gees, that old pilot perception again:
Under those conditions above, pilot could pull backstick, get ANU pitching moment, impact -- but any G/A is an un-demonstrated maneuver. See long discussion, and documents, and mishaps, cited in slot #50, #55, #61, #73 in thread:
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/35069...ar#post4544029
IGh is offline  
Reply