PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NAS rears its head again
View Single Post
Old 16th Mar 2010, 03:18
  #46 (permalink)  
Capn Bloggs
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,580
Received 77 Likes on 45 Posts
NAS Implementation Team
The chief of which who wrote that radio would reduce safety in CTAFs because pilots relied on it. Credibility=0!

The real fundamentalists here are the group of pilots who want no change, and want to "fundamentally" keep Australia mired in Australian unique standards.
What a load of rubbish. We want ICAO C, not ICAO E, that's all. ICAO D would be nice too.

working our way through volumes of delineated and documented hazards, the available mitigators, the mitigators to be applied, and the assessment and disposition of the final quantitative and qualitative risks
Well then, you'd clearly remember the mitigators that you relied on to stop HiCap IFR jets running into VFRs in non-radar E. What are they?

I also assume you did a cost-benefit analysis on C verse E. Please post the results or provide a link.
Capn Bloggs is online now