PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why 1.3 Vs for approach?
View Single Post
Old 15th March 2010 | 20:25
  #4 (permalink)  
RansS9
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: coventry
1.3Vso my mistake.

I didn't know the 3 degree slope was in part chosen because of maingear limiting rates of descent in jets. However in my defense I don't know quite alot of things and it seems to get worse as I get older!

It appears that the 1.3 seems to be Large Jet-centric (no problem there) but does that make it as valid in the light aviation sector ?

TIM

(13,000hrs 777, 330's 707's cf 200hrs C152, Robin160, Pitts S1
Okay you definately win the TOP TRUMPS )
RansS9 is offline  
Reply