It was never advertised as a scientific poll WWW and as my previous post showed I am more than willing to bring its failings to the attention even if it may attract criticism from those who don't agree with its results.
Rather than find holes in the security, it may be more worthwhile to question the integrity of those who may have acted to push things a little more to favour their standpoint.
Also a rather questionable statement directed against the IPA from someone who should be demonstrating objectivity.
In which case I think you should be looking at the EZY thread and cautioning against using this poll's results as a basis of argument.
I have declined the invitation to vote on this as I do not want to skew the results but I can envisage others who may not have such scruples distorting things and then using their own distortion to argue their own for/anti stance.
In light of your admission perhaps you should close this thread, it seems more divisive than you may have intended. And we don't want that, do we?