Maui,
As usual all you have to offer is politically motivated hogwash. The predicament the Fund finds itself in now is the end result of the avaricious actions of some of your mates up on the 6th floor. Had the assets been signed over, ultimately they would have been controlled by a staffer, is that what you wanted??
With regard to the AFSL, would you have the Fund flout the law and just carry on regardless??
As for member benefits, the position Spag has on AFAP membership is all too common, i.e. the only reason they have AFAP membership is to get the LOL offered by the Fund. Might I respectfully suggest that your mates on the 6th floor urgently address this issue and desist with their campaign of harassment and vilification of the Fund.
I look forward to your critique of the audited accounts!!