This leads us to the biggest flaw in the french legal system. In the US and British system the judge acts as the administrative function in applying the law. The role of the jury is to resolve any issue of truth as it relates to the facts. Here the administrative panel determines what "the truth" is. Any reasonable person with a high school education can really determine that this accident was decades in the making and that combination of circumstances reflects entirely on the airline and its operational and flight procedures. Viewed from this perspective the total absense of AF as a defendent points clearly to a political coverup at the highest level.
Why do you not pop over to France and share all of your knowledge with the court?
Bring all your friends with a high school education.
The French courts are begging to be educated by wiser sources than those available to them. I sense that you feel you can plug the gap.
Were you so interested in the case of AZF?
The procedure was the same but in a diffferent locality.
There were numerous deaths.
As it happens there was no US individual nor corporation involved.
So it was not much reported in the US.