Totally boring to read through arguments by posters talking past each other for numerous posts. Most of these arguments will be adjudicated by the court.
To me they are all valid arguments so once stated there is little to gain by trying to covince each other of who is more right.
I learned that taking valid arguments to a jury trial is still a large chance in the outcome.
But is this really a trial by jury of whose arguments carry the most weight, or is this a deterministic trial by judges against the law of the land?
Either way once the arguments are put foward there is liittle that our say will weigh on the matter.
ready to hear more arguments without the bashing
