Lurker,
the post had been removed. It wasn't made by a moderator and contained nothing but cryptic info so that you would know that the person knew who you where. Any 'threat' was to inform the company that you possibly had enployememt that may be restricted by your contract. If your not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to be concerened about.
Again, logic suggest that a mod knows your details without having to work it out by referance to your post history! Like lala if you showed some restraint when embellishing your grievances you might not illicate the level of anger that can only lead to conflict.
I pretty sure you said you hadn't informed the company in an earlier post and stated you knew you should have. So for clarity you will be striking even in the court finds that BA has not imposed a contractual change on principle but feel quite happy to admit you haven't complied with that contract on an other matter!
Why do bassa/unite followers think the truth is a weapon to be manipulated to prove/disprove any position that differs from theirs?