PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Team AIPA blames others for poor showing at FWA
Old 24th Jan 2010, 16:38
  #52 (permalink)  
titan uranus
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: aus
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar for one, where senority is a "major considersation". Not the sole consideration. The argument is not to abandon seniority altogether here.

Just about every other carrier in the world, bar a couple of dying legacy carriers works in similar fashion through different variations. I know TL, as I've worked for some.

The point being discussed runs deeper than just promotion though: it relates to change of aircraft type, change of base, redundancy lists, etc.

A myriad of complex scenarios.

The business model at Jetstar is too complex for strict datal seniority.
-The operation is growing too quickly
-Has introduced many aircraft types rapidly
-Has too many bases, which it tends to close/open/vary all too flipantly
-Is a complex mix of operation
-Has a wide range of experience levels
-IS A LOW COST CARRIER

Want strict datal seniority and what it can afford, then there's always QF.

Last edited by titan uranus; 24th Jan 2010 at 16:56.
titan uranus is offline