Originally Posted by
Boondocker
T or C
No, sure enough. But there are some of us that could have used the 'detail' as a counter argument to the 'doubters.'
It may also have forced BASSA to respond and/or enabled it's membership to ask some uncomfortable questions.
Maybe, but as they were unwilling to believe the PWC figures in general, I doubt (Oh dear, I've just become one!) the detail would have bothered them at all, and the general denial of anything uncomfortable would have continued.
The general gist of the PWC report should have been enough. The breakdown may have included too much detailed information for the public domain.