His disregard for selection and his open heart towards people of varying financial backgrounds supporting people through their training. He thinks it's commendable that people pay to fly. Why? Probably because it is what his son did after finishing Oxford though I admit I am guessing and I could be way off - I am sure I am. It fits his scenario. Ultimately he is socialist because he seems to believe in this 'shared ownership' of the training and the end result. An example:
IF I had the funds I would have liked to have help some of those who could not afford the course with a loan.
Now I have justified my comment, I don't wish to over analyse the chap as I am sure he is a sound person and this is becoming deeply irrelevant to the thread.
Is that ok?
Art: a superior skill that you can learn by study and practice and observation. Thank you Adios! That aside, play nice - this is only a rumour network - I am starting to feel like a troll with all this nit picking. Forget the character assassinations, as I will, and stay focussed on the important topic shall we?