Why should BASSA let this regime give away the DA agreement as this forms part of our terms and conditions after all the imposition that came into force back in november. We are not playing ball as the other team are not playing fair with dirty tricks coming back again and again wake up and smell the sewage coming from Waterworld.
I'm more concerned that once again BASSA seem to have lied to its members and accused BA of simply riding roughshod, when in fact they requested DA of BASSA as they were supposed to. Unless Romans44 was holding back on us.
So, how it works, BASSA say "No" to BA out of spite, completely neglecting their paying customers (again), thus forcing BA to react accordingly.
Then they blame BA for that reaction, slyly neglecting to mention that they've forced it upon them.
Wave bye bye to the moral high ground.
This union are so utterly predictable; no wonder they can lose a court case even when they've been warned in advance what they're doing wrong. I think Absolute Numpties is the perfect description.
Romans44: Just read your last message. So it is clear BASSA haven't told you that BA asked. We only await confirmation of what has been said on here by both sides - that BA asked and BASSA said No.