Romans said:
it would have cost the company nothing to simply inform BASSA of their intetion of implement the disruption agreement.
Wobble2Plank replied:
They did. No less than 6 times. They 'requested', in accordance with the agreements, from BASSA that the disruption agreement be implemented.
Hmmmm. So Romans44, were you under the impression that BA had not requested this? If so, BASSA have obviously kept this vital information from you. This of course would mean they are misleading their members again, falsely implying that BA callously ignored protocol before being forced to act.
Or were you aware of it and trying to pull the wool over our eyes?
Or is Wobble making it up?
I think we should know the truth. What say you Romans44? Wobble, do you have a source please?