PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Contaminated Performance @3mm?
View Single Post
Old 12th January 2010 | 14:32
  #12 (permalink)  
Bamboid
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: SE UK
Thanks for the replies, I agree with 100above's interpretation that since 3mm exactly, is less than '>3mm' then for pure definition purposes 3mm can be regarded as wet.

One of the reasons for my query, was that the first column of my airline's contaminated performance figures, contains data for..... 3mm of contaminant!
Bamboid is offline  
Reply