Originally Posted by
bast0n
I think it was pilot error and I also think that their RAF Lordships have behaved abominably, so we have a little common ground.
David
Bast0n,
Hello again. I was taken aback by your comment that you've always been against the verdict of Gross Negligence - that's not how I remembered your posts at all.
I just had a look back at pages 269/270/271, and you seem more than satisfied with the original verdict.
However, when I come to reply to your post, your suggestion that the verdict was unfair/disgraceful - can't remember the exact words you used - has gone.
Have you been reminded/remembered how you entered the thread?
In answer to BOAC's question - From your #5413:
Originally Posted by
bast0n
Exactly - you have it in one! Cut out all the conjecture from the "what if" brigade - stick to what is known and there you have it. An aircraft flown into the ground in bad weather that they should have avoided.............
These are the "known facts" he was asking you to confirm, I believe.
You also stated the Airworthiness of the aircraft was irrelevant in your #5390
Has your position on any of this changed?
Kind regards,
TN