MFgeo, if you're convinced the whole thing is a sham then there's not much i can say to persuade or debate otherwise. You still haven't answered the basic scientific fact that adding more greenhouse gas to the atmosphere increases the greenhouse effect. Saying the conference had nothing to do with science is nonsense. Of course politics, money etc is involved, but go to the IPCC site and read through their reports, it's all science.If you want to say that the whole (or a great part of) the scientific community is wrong then so be it, the debate is then pointless if objective evidence is ignored.
Even accepting it is a global scam/con/whatever - to what end?