I'm sure I am being over-simplistic, but to me now this whole sorry affair is branching.
Are we not at the point where on the one hand we need a simple change of verdict from GN to CNPD and a separate more serious investigation into the confirmations apparent in the letters from the 2 ACMs? Perhaps another 'Haddon-Cave'?
On a separate point, I assume the 2 ACM's were 'advised' on the content of their letters by 'MOD', but I would like to know why the admission of prior knowledge of defects (and thus presumably the position of Boscombe) is now openly on record?
We have yet to pick up on Brian's #6003 by the way. Can someone do that please?